Rus Articles Journal

Vital scenario. Whom to be - the actor or the director?

We come to this life directors of own life. We have an opportunity to independently decide that for us it is good and that it is bad, and we bear responsibility for any actions. And we always have a choice: or we shoot the own movie, or we go to act to others.

Whom among people it is more - actors or directors? To answer this question, it would be possible to address statistics, but it seems to me, the answer already lies on a surface: it is more actors, it is less directors, and it is obvious. If all were directors, then who would act in their movies?

Directors need actors for the embodiment of the plans, and actors need directors that someone operated them on a shooting stage. Perhaps, many actors would like to become directors and to shoot own movies, but not all manage it. And someone does not need it at all, each profession has the specifics, and it is the cornerstone of its choice. In actors there are people who dream to be as someone, in directors - those who do not want to resemble anybody, want to present to the world something absolutely new, and through it to realize the life.

And what in life? And in life everything is absolute also except that it is not necessary to arrive anywhere that someone to become. Each of us, having only been born, it appears in the movie in which there is only one leading role, and this role - it and it is more of nobody. Moreover, it is just that case when the major role is played by the director. But not all this is understood. Since the childhood we are surrounded by other directors who offer us roles in the movies, and actors who could not or did not want to shoot the own movie. Directors speak: go to me, in we wash the movie and for you the role will be. Actors speak: it is necessary to be very good actor that you were noticed.

Each child, coming to this life, accurately realizes the role. It - main. But it does not suit “adults“, they consider that the right of domination belongs to them on the basis of the number of the lived years. And they begin “to explain“ who “actually“ main. And it is good if parents by the time of the birth of the kid realized the roles and everyone realized himself the director of own life. And if parents understood nothing yet, missed the life and play only roles in someone else`s movies whom they will be able to bring up? Actor of mass meeting? Not the fact that at them it will turn out, but in any case they will try to make it just because they have no other experience, and experience should be passed on, same “child“, it needs “to be learned, to bring up“. The fact that the child himself we can teach much the parents, as a rule, is not considered, “he small, foolish“.

We come to this life directors of own life. We have an opportunity to independently decide that for us it is good and that it is bad, and we bear responsibility for any actions. Naturally, we do not live in emptiness. We are surrounded by the same people, around there are events, from us not dependent, but sometimes influencing our life. We always have a choice. Or we shoot the own movie, or we go to act to others.

There is a question: so if you are a director, then in someone else`s movies you do not have the place? Of course, is. You will act in movies of other directors if to invite you and you will agree. Just never you should forget that the main thing for you is the movie which is shot by you. And to protect the director`s chair from those who will try to occupy it.

Though... I argue from the point of view of the director. But there are also actors and, probably, they think in a different way. Generally, everyone has a choice. But I will tell honestly: to me as to the director, it is more interesting to communicate with directors, to act at directors and to remove directors. And actor... The actor in own movie is a director who lost the chair, and now other directors decide how to it further to live.