What do the civil rights and freedoms differ from the rights and freedoms of the person in? Part 2the Personal rights and freedoms of the person provide independence and relative freedom of the person as member of civil society. These rights initially have the status of the natural and inaliennable rights therefore cannot be object of claims of the state. Observance of the personal rights is a necessary condition when forming a democratic political regime in the state. personal human rights the right for life (the death penalty is applicable only for especially serious crimes against life), the right for the dignity of the personality, the right for freedom and security of person, the right for personal privacy, etc. are among
. Among the personal rights also the right for inviolability of the dwelling, the right to define and specify the national identity, right to use the native language etc. of
of personal human rights are called the social rights are among: freedom of worship and freedom of worship, freedom of thought and word, right for information, right for free medicine. At the same time the promotion or propaganda exciting social, racial, national or religious hatred and hostility is not allowed. Promotion of social, racial, national, religious or language superiority is forbidden.
All specified rights and many other social norms are enshrined in the constitution of the state, and they are carried out or not, it is a subject for reflection of sociologists and defenders of human rights at the different levels. And there is a certain priority in all arriving complaints to human rights violation connected with doctrines about an extremity of the world and the person about options of “outcome“ of world history, the cash life defined in the rights and freedoms of the person as a freedom of worship.
The freedom of worship includes also freedom of worship, i.e. the right to be a believer or the non-believer, to choose or change the belief, and exactly there are position fights with participation of the state and human rights activists. Each person has a right for the world outlook choice. However the personal freedom assumes a maturity of the person, his ability to critically estimate surrounding reality.
The mythical and religious traditions forming ideology of society represent mainly syuzhetno - figurative, symbolical options of eschatology (different versions of myths). The philosophical doctrines including eschatological motives also lean on a certain type of mythical or religious eschatology. There is a judgment of symbols, images, characters according to fundamental metaphysical concepts forming moral principles of society.
As it was already told, the metaphysics social finds social life of people and things beyond the scope of their spatial, corporal manifestation and interaction where the person “sees“ at the level of sensory perception. Protagor`s thesis that the person is a measure of all things remains open in a question of a role of the person in creation or detection of regularity of life and spiritually - theoretical need of existence of metaphysics of this sort.
Thanks to consciousness of people as the conceiving being (“I think“), it is capable to comprehend sacral truth of belief, hope and love, as “body“ of this comprehension serves human heart. The person since the birth and to a grave is shipped in the system generated by a family, a sort, the tribe and the state sacral by means of ideology. Preservation of the sacred relation to a cult object first of all is provided with conscience of the believer who appreciates a shrine more own life.
The church and the state develop difficult and thin system of protection of all forms of public life and relation of people to basic ideals of the developed culture. There are also different points of view about a condition of a freedom of worship in Russia claiming, for example, that “realization of a freedom of worship in modern Russia is in the deepest system crisis and there is a place of numerous violations of freedom of worship“.
However by detailed consideration of this statement it is possible to note that it not so, and it does not belong to traditional sources of religion. Offenses on oppressions are stated generally by representatives of religions of “remakes“ and various sects including the laying claim philosophical and ekuministichesky doctrines. At which the concept of education and ideology, except the statement of a personal liberty is unclear.
For example, on the Internet there is a generalization of reasonings of the apostle Pavel on a freedom of worship which reduced to the uniform offer: “For what to my freedom to be the judged others conscience?“ It is possible to answer here thus. In order that your freedom did not prevent to live to me and other members of society. In order that it was not dangerous to the state when we see how the freedom of worship in some European states is finished to the point of absurdity and often contradicts the nature of the person.
And in this case the freedom of worship of the person is limited to moral criteria of the state morals where the soul and belief are a life basis, that solution which provides durability of a social order. By the principles of equality when freedom of one person comes to an end where freedom of other person begins. Cave men, cannibals, Aztecs and pagans of Carthage killing own children had some freedoms understood only by them too.
Therefore society also prefers to have near itself habitual religions with clear initial texts. For example, in the main religious faiths - Christianity, Islam and the Buddhism, fundamental doctrines have analogies and do not contradict the positions designated in the constitution in the field of protection of human rights:
1. Do not kill.
2. Do not steal.
3. Do not make adultery.
4. Do not lie.
5. Do not talk scandal.
6. Do not speak roughly.
7. Be not engaged in idle talk.
8. Do not solicit someone else`s property.
9. Do not show hatred.
10. Thoughts it is just.