Rus Articles Journal

You wrote us? Do not open! We read! How to us to improve the syllable? Already it happened to me to brand

illiterate, quasicompetent and pseudo-competent here. Of course, I am objected: a pier, there are just slips or typographical errors... Of course, happen. But they differ from mistakes in the fact that the text can be missed and at once to correct, and it is possible and to leave so. The question is in whether respects writing those who will read. If is not present - it is possible and not to correct. However we now about another.

and besides spelling errors things which irritate the captious reader (it I) are. For example, appeared recently in in writing - colloquial texts capital letter And in the word “write“. Here by all means! Something like that comes across it seems “I about it wrote to records of the blog already yesterday“, or “as the great poet“ and so on wrote. Or on the contrary: my cat peed in slippers again.

Well as without capital letter to guess what means? Perhaps, the cat enclosed in slippers a note, and the great poet... well I do not know that?. Here it is interesting to me as what, hm, near it is necessary to consider the readers that so to think of them? As - the same Alexander Sergeyevich Our everything did without it in the lines:

So he wrote, darkly and faded...


you wrote me. Do not open. I read.

I somehow soon 200 years as readers understand everything correctly, without And.

It was difficult for me even to think up the offer in which it is really unclear what means. But at last I thought up: the frequenter of diaries has three requirements - to drink, eat and write. In all other cases the context helps out.

There is still an unpleasant manner - to each statement to attribute IMHO (or who is more competent - IMHO). I hate IMHO essentially, but not emotionally (as godovas in subpublic healthcare institutions). Because on which it is necessary it is IMHO? Everything that we tell - it is anyway our opinion! If the person does not bring the author of the statement - “as Katull spoke“... - means, it is his thought, and why all the time it to emphasize? Some sanctimonious humility for show. Like, such I modest, such modest.

But the most mass phenomenon is diminutive .

To use diminutive - it, maybe, even is competent, rules do not forbid, but to what it is sometimes sickening! Let`s lay aside pregnant women and feeding, speak, they are overflowed hormones, from here infinite by puzozhitel, golopopik, kushank, spatenk and even (put a cup on a table!) glandoamputishechka . But to quarrel with this category of citizens inhumanely therefore we will forgive them.

But also among others - not pregnant and not feeding - it meets, for some reason more often in culinary, amateur communities and in communities about pets. Yum-yum, nyamka, cookies, vlyublenysh, night dress and gubnushka, kotyavochka, pukhnastik. Happens, and the recipe of a dish it seems good and as it is written - myasko, slivochka, a pepper, mayanezik, an ukropchik and uksusik ... So already and there is no wish to do this dish, it is sick sladenko!

And there is a wish to remind an old joke: mummy takes to the doctor of the adult son:

- The doctor, at my boy is something from pisy!
- From now on pisyu we call the member and we treat a gonorrhea!

Of course, both the youth slang, and all these speech tricks are in some degree a sign of belonging to pack. It seems as the statement - I the, I is the! Very widespread thing among teenagers, but I - that speak about adults. When the person in 20 - 30 - expresses 40+ years and behaves as a dvenadtsatiletka - it is already opposite.

And here at last I read:

“Weak-mindedness finds the reflection in specific symptoms of speech disturbance - in delay of its speed, the use of diminutive words and speech stamps, in an oligofaziya. Sometimes in the speech of feeble-minded epileptics floridity, aspiration to embellish the speech, tendency to primitive rhyming is noted“. V. M. Bleykher, Clinic of the acquired weak-mindedness.

“Pseudo-dementia is often replaced by a puerilizm in which clinical picture the behavior and statements peculiar to children dominates. Patients do toys, for example, from paper, play them, collect and stick pictures, candy wrappers from candies. Speak with children`s intonations, use diminutive words, lisp, lisp“. The guide to psychiatry, under the editorship of A. V. Snezhnevsky, t. 2. me felt better

I at once.

Let`s just try to do without SUPERFLUOUS: sugary diminutive, unnecessary IMHO, silly allocation of letters where is not necessary... And our text will become more harmonous and more solid, easier and it is more convenient for perception.

And so, generally, of course - “in the little man everything has to be fine: both face, and dushonka, and clothes, and drizzles“ (c).