Rus Articles Journal

WHETHER it is POSSIBLE to WRITE the bad POEM?

.

WHETHER and at d and about
version of this story on realmusic

CAN WRITE to
the bad POEM?

or bad picture or music? whether
=============================

Can write the bad poem or the story to the ordinary person? It seems to me it is impossible. I always claimed that in order that it is bad to make something to somebody in the field of art - it is necessary somewhere long and to persistently study or do it for money. I approved all this, but I will try - on own personal experience - here that came to my mind … today and we will try at once, without postponing. I will try to write a bad free verse.
to me can be objected that I am talented. But whether the talented person can badly write specially? (Worsening skillfully if the author is talented, he can achieve big achievements in the negative plan?)

The free verse is a poem without rhyme
without pajamas … without Rome … innocently …
without wine and vodka … without cigarettes and a tickling … without girl of
which is putting on tights … the free verse
not to extend its
without measure … without salt … is time to finish
and raisin
we will analyse

A now before being accepted to the following., It seems, I wrote nonsense. But whether so it, can be it just a joke or vanguard? Though, I tried to write silly and thoughtlessly, really, to connect raisin with tights to a pajamas and Rome infinitely senselessly, but all - it is difficult to prove that there is no joke and a smile or vanguard here … It is possible to reproach also that it is not a free verse, but the poem to a floor rhymed and a floor a free verse as a centaur. But this violation moves apart borders and refreshes impression. On a boring background of continuous free verses in the books rolling on my house - thousands of free verses, and suddenly one - a hybrid. The reader will tell: to spit. it I understand
Ya, but as we are pleased by the Greek centaur, also partly and this free verse with rhymed episodes pleases.
Perhaps, everything spoils the analysis? I will try to write several just bad and silly works.

… drank the hammer … drank … drank … milk … a roller of advertizing we will present
to the father and mother …
the dream came running and brought a rose in cellophane … easy to write
badly
- but it is difficult to prove it

… …

I went on not the correct way the matter is that any rubbish always becomes impregnable of - for the fact that it is always possible to hide, having dropped that, say, and can do it avangardno. So we will remove avant-garde at all, and in the clear text, everything that it will be bad, will not find a justification, and it will become extremely noticeable.

So.

We will write at first the poem usual and good it seems, and then we will begin to worsen it systematically.

the text attracts and attracts to itself … as the country which you do not know and you want to learn … that ahead? what`s next? what then? what there? what?
therefore you rearrange words … you connect their boundary yourself … you re-read with curiosity as the reader the first … only and depends only on you each turn ahead as if you in the car without the
windows one … … you place that other window in the car … and: more cozy and more curiously … and even you can soft make a bench … are lower higher depending on characters in a window … depending on a state of mind
operating a window and hulk and the car you as the small human child or the little Lord …
Not successful experience was got by

. In - the first, it is too well written and it is difficult to spoil, in - the second, it is a pity to touch it, to worsen not that, even to improve. In the third, and the main thing, it is too bulky.
I Will try to originate the text, a fragment and to spoil it, honestly and honestly. So, here is how the fragment on which I will work looks, worsening it:

the text attracts and attracts to itself … as the country which you do not know and you want to learn … that ahead? what`s next? what then? what there? what?

and now we will bring a number of banal comparisons and we will look, and we will add not the necessary repetitions, and, maybe, and I will add some specifications grounding poetry:

the text attracts and attracts to itself as the native land of which I am proud and I love … which you do not know and you want to learn … that ahead? what`s next? what then? what there? what? Maybe there is something not familiar … about what I did not read anything anywhere

There now, I even managed to add patriotism in vain that always automatically unpleasantly. And comparison deteriorated towards banality.
In the poem appeared slightly more logic, and the logic grounds poetry. But it became especially bad not because all this is neutral patriotism, but not that which from soul turns back. So it was not succeeded to spoil in it the direction.
as a result, you want - you do not want, I proved again though I honestly fought against it (really the reader does not trust me, and thinks that I feign ignorance and I dissemble?) what it is impossible to write badly how you will try.
Well, really, behind this patriotism is not felt internal mercantile pleasure that it will be pleasant to the administration that it will be published with a big circulation and the fee.
A will place the text in the abc-book - learn to respect a pier children the homeland and the government at the same time. It is a bright illustration that I am right, it is impossible to write badly neither unintentionally, nor intentionally. Nothing unpleasant in the text is felt. Even something classical flew in feeling. Only at the classic about the homeland it is possible to read with love, and at any other, even talented writer, always feels sick. But in this episode that I analyzed, I had no familiar feeling of disgust.
And still the text became worse. But for other reasons not from desire to spoil intentionally, it deteriorated for other foreign reason, from that only that I edited it. Pushkin`s recognition “is involuntarily remembered I could never correct at myself nothing“. What he wanted to tell these, I do not know, but it has something in common with my thought that editing surely will impair a little. And if the reader does not agree with it, then he will agree that it is impossible to edit the child. It is impossible at the plastic surgeon a nose for him more beautifully to stick also more fashionable. It is also blasphemous to improve any given rise text, otherwise, having read it, we will spend time for nothing. We never learn in what state of mind there was an author, and it also is the maintenance of a work of art.
Is simple to initial and as it appeared to the perfect statement

“I always claimed that in order that it is bad to make something to somebody in the field of art - it is necessary somewhere long and to persistently study or do it for money.“

should be added: “or to begin to edit it“, and then already to put an end in the offer.