Rus Articles Journal

New scientific truth is not crazy

New scientific truth is not crazy over valuable ideas, obscurantists as if were not puffed up to convince of it society and authors of scientific innovations.

(a reprint with small corrections and additions of article Makeev A. K. Scientific life: New scientific truth is not crazy over valuable ideas, obscurantists as if were not puffed up to convince of it society and authors of scientific innovations! Scientific section of the website of the newspaper of News, date of the publication 16:00 24. 09. 10)

Science are extended in progress by scientific dissidents - heretics in fight against scientific dogmatics and the word - lascivious swindlers.

Crazy over valuable ideas in the field of science are such more - less coherent judgments of a structure, properties, laws of the Universe (the micro and macro world, lifeless and live substance, society and the person) which contradict authentically established scientific laws, daily observable and experimentally registered facts and common sense. Crazy ideas can not contradict the standard scientific representations. When pseudoscientific representations, pseudoscientific dogmas are standard as eternal scientific truth. All scientific judgments which contradict the standard provisions in professional scientific community the vast majority of simple people and professional scientists considers

crazy over valuable scientific ideas. Even then, when scientific innovations do not contradict authentically established scientific laws, daily observable and experimentally registered facts and common sense.

of Judgment of common sense in the field of science are such judgments on scientific questions which lean on such abstract models which describe a structure and function of elements and systems of elements on associative similarity with authentically established in supervision and experiments by a structure and function of daily observed elements and systems of elements.

For example, it is authentically known that big collectives of electromagnetic quanta of visible optical range equally from any direction pass without visible resistance through transparent objects uniform optically of a form, spherical or close to the sphere. Without considerable absorption and (or) dispersion in these optically transparent objects which do not look muddy or opaque. In which opalestsiruyushchy points, threads, lumps are not visible. Optically the transparent objects exceeding the optical density of the transparent environment surrounding optically (for example, air / quartz glass; water / diamond). Refraction of the movement of electromagnetic quanta with their focusing at some distance from the center of the transparent sphere uniform optically is observed at the same time. And the subsequent divergence of the movement of quanta from this focus of a convergence.

If somebody claims that the space can be Wednesday from own quanta which obviously have average speed it is not lower than the velocity of light in vacuum, extremely poorly interacting with each other and with physical fields, with substance. And that collective action of these moving quanta of space on separate material objects and systems of material objects as the ekstrasferovektor of a naletaniye flying on all system of material objects and slightly - slightly changed frequency of own electromagnetic field of the quanta of space which are taking off departure introsferovektor from each material object is the external reason of inertia - masses - gravitation. [1 - 3]

In that case most of professional scientists, without reduction of scientific arguments in the analysis of this model, surely WITHOUT ADDUCING ANY PROOF declare the author of such scientific statement raving over valuable scientific ideas. Because this model is not standard in scientific community. Will not conduct the reasoned scientific dispute with the scientific heretic - the dissident, on their terminology - with the madman.

Or if somebody claims that a natural number of elements can be divided into pieces the periods not only on the standard end of every period on:

1. an element of group of noble gases - an external electronic configuration of np6.

But also on final elements of others of the physicist - chemical types. For example, every period a natural number of elements can terminate on any other of the following seven types of elements:

2. an element of group of halogens - np5;

3. an element of group of oxygen - sulfurs - np4;

4. element of group of nitrogen - phosphorus - np3;

5. an element of group of carbon - np2 silicon;

6. an element of group of pine forest - aluminum - np1;

7. an element of group of shchelochnozemelny metals - ns2;

8. an element of group of alkaline metals - ns1.

And that only the end of every period of a natural number of elements on option 7: an element of group of shchelochnozemelny metals, there is natural, only the correct end of the entire periods. And all other options of the end of the entire periods unnatural, do not display the return fractal (wave) communication with each other of elements in natural sequence of elements on the physicist - to chemical properties. Also will give argument that the German chemist Lothar Meyer in 1864 published PSE fragment with the correct end of the periods on shchyolochnozemelny metal. [4 - 7]

In that case most of professional scientists, without reduction of scientific arguments in the analysis of this PSE model, surely WITHOUT ADDUCING ANY PROOF declare the author of such scientific statement raving over valuable scientific ideas. Because this model is not standard in scientific community. Will not conduct at the same time the reasoned scientific dispute with the scientific heretic, on their terminology - with the madman.

Or if somebody claims that concordants and vowels of a speech can be delivered as physiologically optimum, elementary articulations, and physiologically not optimum, not elementary articulations. That all elementary articulations are described by the natural-science laws of elementary articulations of concordants and vowels of the speech, not known earlier on Earth. That according to these scientific laws all elementary articulations are subdivided into the following six types:

1. Rastvorny (public) articulations.

2. Deafs slot-hole incomplete lock and incomplete solution (concordant) articulations.

3. Ringing slot-hole incomplete lock and incomplete solution (concordant) articulations.

4. Deafs explosive solution from a preliminary lock (concordant) articulations.

5. Ringing explosive solution from a preliminary lock (concordant) articulations

6. Smychny (sonorny) barrier (concordants) articulations.

That along oral department of organs of articulation five rather extended focuses of rastvorny (vowels) and five rather short focuses of barrier (concordant) elementary articulations are observed.

That in each focus of elementary articulations physiologically optimum, elementary articulations deliver to about one sound speeches of each of six types of an articulation. [8, 9]

In that case most of professional scientists and the more so authorities are apologists and the six - seksota of the Russian obscurantist antiscientific inquisition, without reduction of scientific arguments in the analysis of this model and classification of an articulation of sounds of the speech, surely WITHOUT ADDUCING ANY PROOF declare the author of such scientific statement raving over valuable scientific ideas. Because this model is not standard in scientific community. Will not conduct at the same time the reasoned scientific dispute with the scientific heretic - the dissident, on their terminology - with the madman.

When it is impossible to avoid game in “silence“, antiscientific dogmatic obscurantists isolate from statements of the scientific dissident - the heretic one thought which is not rather accurately formulated by him and begin to prove that this thought of the scientific dissident - the heretic is scientifically not right, means also all other scientific provisions of the scientific dissident - the heretic are scientifically insolvent. That is scientifically crazy. Or antiscientifically dogmatic obscurantists leave from scientific provisions of the author aside - they ask the author of scientific innovations questions not about a subject of his scientific provisions to conduct debate in absolutely other scientific or not scientific areas. Most often antiscientifically dogmatic obscurantists are limited only to a problem of questions, but do not allow the innovator of science to answer the asked question, asking everything new and new abstract questions. That is antiscientifically dogmatic obscurantists are engaged in phrase-mongering, verbal fraud! [10 - 12]

Concealment of scientific innovations, slovobludny fraud and the unfounded announcement of scientific dissidents - heretics mentally ill people are means of fight of antiscientific dogmatic persons - obscurantists with scientific progress!

There is such criterion of scientific correctness of innovators of science: “whether Rather new scientific judgment is “mad“, on mere allegations of antiscientific dogmatic persons to be new scientific truth?

in conclusion poetic epilog:

The DOGMATIC PERSON - the OBSCURANTIST, OTHER is not!

Religions are constructed on dogmas,

the Politician vsyak utters doctrines!

In sciences triumphs the same miss:

professors rigidly urges on Marasmus!

Sciences are hated by all tyrants.

On dogmas sprouts a heat of ambitions.

Opening in sciences as a ram, All dogmas as nutlets breaks

.

Satraps hate heretics,

Without wise men - dream: to remain one.

cannot do Without clever, - see.

not to touch dogma, there was an order: to try!

Doctrines,

are not compatible to truth All essence of their lie outside comes up, having covered

I of wise men with a terry mat,

the dogma departures From obscurantists.

But the obscurantist without dogmas cannot live,

He sees truth in a doctrine!

Though any dogma will not help

to Answer tasks in study of the strength of materials!

It is more difficult for heretics to break dogmas,

As truth they are perceived.

is easier and easier to forbid new sciences,

Not better than dogmas supposedly all are understood!

Any dogma - opium to the people!

to All obscurantists dogma - in a brain balm! you will become

With a doctrine on brains the freak,

Without dogmas you come to alphabetical elements!

(Alexander Makeev, Moscow, 2011. 08. 15, it is published on the website verses. ru)

Literature

1. Makeev A. K. ASTROPHYSICS: Physical model of the eternal and infinite Universe. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 12:00 05. 09. 2010.

2. Makeev A. K. SCIENCE: Zero, Infinity, Sferovektor from the outside both Sferovektor outside, and other entities in physics. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 21:00 21. 09. 2010.

3. Makeev A. K. ASTROPHYSICS: Space Attractor. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 12:00 04. 08. 2010.

4. Makeev A. K. From Dyobereyner`s triads through Periodic table of chemical elements of Odlinga - Nyyulendsa - Mendeleyeva to Natural System of Elements of Meyer - Tsimensa - Klechkovsky - Makeev. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 03:35 26. 05. 2010.

5. Makeev A. K. Natural System of Elements of matter - ideal Periodic Table of Elements. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 01:00 09. 05. 2010.

6. Makeev A. K. A key of structure of Periodic System of Elements in a tendency of filling with electrons of layers of an electronic cloud in process of growth of a charge of an atomic nucleus. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 14:00 21. 09. 2010.

7. Makeev A. K. SCIENCE: The natural-science law of Natural Cycles in natural sequence of chemical elements. Scientific section of the website of the Izvestiya newspaper, date of the publication 12:23 20. 03. 2010.

8. Makeev A. K. Laws of elementary articulations. In the book: Science and the present - 2010: the collection of materials II International scientifically - practical conference. In 3 - x parts. Part 1 / Under a general Edition of S. S. Chernov. - Novosibirsk: SIBPRINT publishing house, 2010. - 266 pages, Page 234 - 247. ISBN 978 - 5 - 94301 - 157 - 7. UDC 001 (06). BBK 72ya46.

9. Makeev A. K. Secrets of the Speech are revealed in Russia. Scientific section of the website of the newspaper of News, date of the publication 03. 03. 2010.

10. Makeev A. K. SCIENTIFIC LIFE: Who is the official Russian professional scientist, and who is a contemptible Russian scientific dissident? Scientific section of the website of the newspaper of News, date of the publication 20:00 20. 08. 2010.

11. Makeev A. K. What there is scientific mafia and as to fight against it? Scientific section of the website of the newspaper of News. date of the publication. 17:58 23. 09. 2009.

12. Makeev A. K. SCIENTIFIC LIFE: Project of creation of an authorized international legal legal mechanism of public submission of applications for official scientific examination and registration of discoveries. Scientific section of the website of the newspaper of News, date of the publication 08:09 08. 04. 2009.