Whether to do to the child BTsZh inoculation? Seven times measure
, cut off one...
Physicians and the public do not cease to exaggerate a subject of vaccination of newborns intensively. Since the Russian vaccination became on rails of democracy and mummy could solve, do inoculations to the kids or not, the question “yes“ or “no“ for many still costs an edge.
For anybody not a secret that in the first days of life do to all babies BTsZh inoculation (a tuberculosis vaccine). “Obligation“ was entered since 1955, in two decades after creation of an antitubercular vaccine. This measure became the main prophylactic of tuberculosis in post-war Russia. But very few people reflect why this vaccine is necessary now. Also I did not reflect, did not “burn“ on BTsZh with the younger daughter yet, from senior - that problems were not.
Tuberculosis - an illness, first of all social, especially “dark crude rooms“. Supporters of BTsZh like to cite as an example literature of the 19th century where all heroes amicably died of a consumption, and terrible statistics of this mortality, and in the 20th century mortality fell, allegedly with the advent of inoculations. However they forget to mention that, except inoculations, in hundred years there was a cardinal improvement of a standard of living, people left close cellars, there was an electricity and hot water, food improved, drugs (streptomycin) appeared.
I used the World wide web and took an interest in what proportions mortality and incidence with increase of a standard of living and mass vaccination changed. And here that turned out.
Mortality in England from 1855 to 1947 decreased by 7,7 times, and by 1953 (the beginning of use of BTsZh) - by 14,3 times (it without vaccines).
To the Nye - York. Mortality on 10000 diseased in 1812 - 700 people, in 1882 - 370 (it before opening of a stick of Koch), after the first sanatoria - 180, after World War II (but to vaccines and even to antibiotics) - 48. Total - by 14,6 times.
Poland. BTsZh is obligatory since 1955. Impart four times - in 0, 7, 12 and 18 years. It would seem, tuberculosis has to disappear! However in 1995 incidence 42 persons on 100 thousand, at an epidemic threshold of WHO in 50.
It is comparable with the neighboring Czech Republic where refused BTsZh in 1986. In the same 1995 incidence - 18 people on 100 thousand, and in Slovakia - less than one case (!).
In Holland and the USA BTsZh never was in inoculative calendars. At the same time incidence of tuberculosis - the lowest in the world. Coincidence?
1989. The USSR is still live and is in a minimum of the incidence (an impoverishment and bums still ahead). BTsZh according to plan becomes, as well as in all socialist camp, including China where coverage of children of BTsZh of 97% (!) . So, we watch statistics of tubercular mortality at 100 thousand of the population: The USSR - 8,15; China - 14,65; Holland - 0,2; Australia - 0,35; Canada and the USA - 0,4.
Whether it is necessary to say what in the last four countries is not done by BTsZh? Again coincidence? Really they are not afraid of tuberculosis? Are afraid, still as are afraid! Constantly test all, plus examine all immigrants, in Australia can even officially forbid entrance at the slightest suspicion on a carriage. Even there is no AIDS in this list, and tuberculosis is. Of course, what not in all “safe“ countries is done by BTsZh can be explained with a consequence of low incidence, as supporters of inoculations do.
But how to be with other statistics - complications and mortality owing to BTsZh inoculation? Such hypotheses are quite evidence-based. The phthisiatricians practicing for 30 - 40 years, in particular also speak to B. V. Noreyko and V. P about it. Sukhanovsky which note the weakened general immunity and, as a result, a high susceptibility to various viruses and diseases and significantly more severe forms of a disease at imparted.
Yes what far to go!? My daughter Sasha - a living example. After vaccination at the child immunity so decreased that the organism did not cope with normalization of flora of intestines, and staphylococcus, a streptococcus, dysentery developed. Drug treatment did not help. Only the homeopathy rescued. Naturally, out of harm`s way, I wrote refusal of vaccination of the daughter till one and a half years.
Understand me correctly! I not against inoculations. Perhaps, to someone they are vital. Much save life. But, before making some vaccine, it is necessary to examine comprehensively the child, but not just to take temperature and to look at a throat! At an extract found a cyst of a vascular texture of a brain in my daughter. And it is one of the main reasons for branch from any inoculation! Capital medical stars in general advise not to touch the child till 3 - 5 years, his own, natural immunity will not be created yet.
Here is how the immunologist - the allergist, the doctor of the first category practicing 7 years, Olga Vladimirovna Ilchenko commented on my case:
- Vaccination - a subject problem. On the one hand, it is necessary to protect from socially important and vitally dangerous causative agents of infectious diseases, with another - without readiness of an organism for creation of the sufficient immune answer it is dangerous to do .
Violations of functions of immune system (immunokomprometirovannost) at children can arise at pre-natal infection, breastfeeding less than three months, pathologies of incubation, childbirth (including Cesarean section, prompt childbirth) and the postnatal period, especially pre-natal hypoxia, asphyxia, a patrimonial trauma, prematurity. Children who it is long also treat this group and often SARS are ill, are in a stage of remission of chronic inflammatory pathology, in a stage of remission of allergic and autoimmune diseases.
Besides the listed risk factors, the child in principle is born with a physiological immunodeficiency, and formation of the specific immune answer begins only with six-months age, and comes to an end to five - six years. So the case with my daughter described in article is not vaktsinalny complication, and shows the child`s immunokomprometirovannost (a cyst of a vascular texture of a brain - disbioz intestines).
For today the relation to obligatory vaccination against tuberculosis changed: its efficiency in prevention of infectious forms of tuberculosis is not clear (A. A. Mikhaylenko, G. A. Bazanov - 2004) as the reactivity to a tuberkulin remaining after vaccination complicates early diagnostics and treatment of the persons infected with tuberculosis (R. Ya. Meshkova - 1999).
In Sweden obligatory antitubercular vaccination of newborns is stopped in 1975. In England only persons from risk groups on tuberculosis are vaccinated. In Germany antitubercular vaccination is carried out only from 16 years. In the USA control and prevention of an antitubercular infection are based on early identification and treatment of patients with an active form, preventive therapy of persons with a latent form of an infection, vaccination of risk groups (N. M. Gizatulina - 1997, R. Ya. Meshkova - 1999).
Of course, ideally before any vaccination it is necessary to investigate the immune status. But today it is labor-consuming and expensive procedure. In this regard creation of the simplest and available model of inspection suitable for mass application is necessary (immunological screening, for example, special the test - strips). However in the conditions of the existing financing of health care it is almost impracticable. And until this mechanism started working, it is necessary to allocate risk groups clinically. Because with deficiency or deficiency in separate links of immune system, at best, we will not gain the planned protective effect of application of vaccinal anti-genes, in the worst, the additional anti-gene irritation can cause the inadequate reaction of an organism provoking development of allergic diseases.
And the creation of specific immunity against dangerous infections (poliomyelitis, diphtheria, measles, a rubella, parotitis, whooping cough, tetanus) reached by vaccination it is necessary to carry out, but only taking into account an immunokomprometirovannost.