1. Leading questions can confuse or cause the nervousness which is often badly hidden at the same time there can be a pulse increase, face reddening or ears, trembling of hands, the strengthened potovydeleniye, change of a timbre of a voice, an expectoration as though choked on something to win time for considering of the answer or continuation of the composition of deceptive history. In a voice to appear a shiver it is Often possible to notice a podragivaniye a leg or a frequent perestupaniye from one leg on another.
2. Inconsistency. The stories composed by the liar often have incompleteness and some illogicality in construction. By means of the unexpected leading questions which were more opening a subject the liar, getting unawares, begins “to get out“ that it is easy to notice.
3. Often at the noticeable increased “diligence“ to get out, there are speech reservations, verbosity behind which the desire to confuse questioning is covered, or, on the contrary pauses, at taking “a time - a miss“, for premeditation of the following course.
4. The strong negative emotions turning into explosion. Attack tactics. often passing to humiliation or an insult of the interlocutor, in attempt to compel for counter explosion of emotions that in such state, the enraged interlocutor could not build a logical chain of questions and conclusions.
5. If action happens almost on your eyes, let us assume, your husband met
“acquaintance“ who rendered slightly noticeable signs of attention which you managed to notice, be attentive at the time of conversation. It is very hard for it to get out. He will convince that or it seemed to you, and, doing it with an affected smile, smiling only lips, or right there will try to think up a ridiculous story. If tells actually the truth, then emotional drawing on his face and behavioural changes will hardly take place.
6. The liar usually smiles to smooth tension, but he does it after tells lies, and at the wrong time, being concentrated on inventing of the version of the incident.
7. At deceivers all to fall from hands, lachrymation, slightly noticeable shiver in a body, a throwing up and down can appear. Everything depends on its abilities, will power and nervous system, ability of to constrain or to experience. But to try to look you fool in the face and a long time hardly anyone will manage without attempts to leave from your fixed studying look. It is good if at everything at the same time you are capable to keep endurance and calm.
8. It is possible to try to accompany the deceiver and to participate in the composition of its history, without forgetting to ask couple of compromising questions a minute of weakening of its attention in time.
9. Do not indulge the interlocutor only in attempt to expose you the fool since it will calm him and will give him confidence, to him the inspiration can come. But on excessive garrulity and a delicacy it is possible to doubt truthfulness of his explanations also.
10. If you try to ask it to retell anew everything that was told earlier, then you will notice emergence of new nuances and details which were for some reason missed. Besides when retelling, lying, not expecting that it about it will be asked, can get confused that will not disappear from your close attention behind the story course. But let`s it express at first up to the end, so it will be easier for you “to catch“ it, and to it to get confused. Telling the truth, will be able to repeat the history in accuracy. Remember what it began with and ask to repeat from this point.
11. Build a logical chain of conclusions, you watch sequence of the facts reflected in conversation. Lack of creation of logic of explanations will force the deceiver to look for ways and subterfuges to try to smooth discrepancies. And than more skillfully he will try to make it, the volume will cause even more suspicions of inveracity of a statement of the invented material.
12. If in the history of the liar there are an estimated route and time, ask to draw quickly the scheme of a route and temporary bindings, and then analyse. The liar overtaken unawares by unpreparedness and unexpectedness of such offer will make surely mistakes.
13. There are, of course, many other ways and methods, but they will not be able to help you with daily practice, but if in it there is a special need, then it is possible to use them. It is the lie detector, a method scanning of a brain, EEG, the computer analysis of a voice, a method the based on tracking of movements of eyes, mnemotekhnichesky analysis, etc.
14. Ask questions on which you know answers and which do not cause in you suspicion, and between them try to set provocative. It is quite good if you have assistants asking approximately the same questions, but in different statement. Answers to them can differ since to watch all at once and to try to answer “truthfully“ all and to everyone complicates a task for interrogated.
15. If you have an ability non-standard to think, ask the question deprived of a logiya or capable to confuse, and it is possible to ask on absolutely abstract subjects, and then unexpectedly coming back to the main subject. To tell the truth about one and inconsiderately lie about another at the interlocutor it can not to turn out. It is possible also to try to change a subject. The deceiver will apprehend this offer as the simplification necessary for it, tired from inventing and lies. The person telling the truth will seek to continue conversation as it has enough arguments and it cannot continue dialogue.
16. Do not forget about an opportunity to demand from the interlocutor to confirm information offered you through the mediated faces, and to do it it is necessary to intimidate immediately or at least thus.
17. Interrogated feels subconsciously fear of possible exposure that at some moment can become obvious so be attentive. If you well know this person, then taking into account experience of communication with it, to you will be to make it much easier if you are not present - use all possible ways described above.
18. If you have any assumptions of the place of stay of your deceiver or rather specific people, then ask questions, using words or names on this subject. At the same time, the possibility of a guess or knowledge something, will force the deceiver to worry and make mistakes more considerably.
Everyone will have many ways to distinguish the liar, proceeding from life experience or possession of those skills. It is possible just to tell your history to someone from relatives who, perhaps, not prejudicedly, will estimate truthfulness of the arguments offered you or will consider as fiction.
If all from the listed ways appear not enough, it does not mean yet that you are told the truth. There are very capable deceivers of whom to get to the core extremely difficult, but do not think that their life from it is easier to become. How many to a thread will end not to curling - a ball sooner or later. Perhaps then at it there will occur the disappointment in deeds and he to you about it admits. But you should not count on it, there where the lie - happiness will not be, with rare exception, if deception is made for the good, but about such option to write it was not provided.