How to the simple inhabitant and how the oligarch can participate in charity?
In the first part of article we concerned first of all monetary options of participation in charity from the ordinary inhabitant and considered those sums with which begins EFFECTIVE, LARGE-SCALE charity. Below we will concern other options of participation in charity of both the ordinary person, and the richest people, up to oligarchs (it will be a question of MONUMENTAL charity). About that that will remain for ever. But also we will think here over what: to give “fifty-kopeck piece“ to the beggar in the subway is a charity or a tip? Well, we will continue.
6. A cube with “cabbage“. Shops
it is not about heads of cabbage in huge vegetable cages for transportation Here, and about a plastic, transparent box with a cut that are established in some Moscow shops. On a box the plate, type is fixed: “Help to children“. Or: “The help to it - that to the temple“. Some buyers after payment of products in cash desk give up delivery into a cut. Who will lower a coin in 5 rubles. The banknote on 10 rubles is a lot of, pyatidesyatirublevka come across. 500 rubles will very seldom flash, and absolutely the thousand note shines with a pearl from a cube.
You look., It seems, pushing the note in a crack or throwing off a trifle there, you support unfortunate orphans. To a monetary cube, I will remind, the adhesive tape stuck the explanation “To the aid of children“. It is only absolutely unclear what children are. Where they live? In Africa? And Asia? In Russia? How many to them years? Perhaps, they are similar to “orphans“ from “Twelve chairs“ Ilf and Petrov from the Director of almshouse Alkhen performed by Oleg Tabakov?
And it is quite probable that the director of shop where such monetary cubes are established, means the children, but delicately holds back it in the plate “To the aid of children“? Suddenly in connection with crisis and thorough decrease in consumer activity the director lacks means to pay training of the offspring in England, for example? And here - support from a magic cube! You look, so England or the USA will receive one more cool Russian-speaking employee in the person of the management offspring. So, despite transparency of a cube with money, besides, there is no transparency in a question where money will leave this cube.
7. To carry things to the temple.
If you go in decent clothes and to you in it is warm, then it does not mean at all, as to other people it is also good. As the priest, ordinary, wordly people told in one of interview, sometimes do not represent at all how many rather poor parishioners wait for the ware help. They elementary do not have money for the elementary new things. Pensioners, single mothers, disabled people, the large families, refugees and other ordinary people who fell into a difficult situation - all of them with hunting sort and carry things which offered to the temple more wealthy parishioners. To help persons in need unnecessary you, but still strong things through mediation of the temple is one of the most real opportunities to make a good cause for each ordinary person.
8. If you are an owner of plants, newspapers, steamships. Monumental charityHere the scale of charity is pertinent
absolutely other. Build at own expense hospital. To take on continuous care the whole Orphanage moreover not capital, and it is much better - deep-provincial. Such to which anybody has business. It will not be shown on the TV and about which will not write in the press. It is aerobatics - to help quietly, not brightly, not under gloss of spotlights and a stare of television cameras. It seems to me that it very on - acceptable to help persons in need MONUMENTALLY if you are really rich.
If so it developed that money vaslyubit, as gratitude to the country where you move the capitals, it is possible to help less successful citizens. It is unlikely there is a rationality to build hospital for the money where - nibud in Uganda when our domestic similar establishments are often begged. The rich man, as they say, Heaven urges to share with persons in need. And not fifty rubles, not five hundred or one thousand. Here it is about MONUMENTAL projects.
9. To help persons in need, at the same time disappearing as the guerrilla. whether
Should be broadcast continually that you participate in charity? Probably, is not necessary. But also completely to suppress the good cause - too to anything. If you tell the person as you built procedure of the help to the same kids in Orphanage, for example, that your interlocutor, perhaps, too will want to participate in process and then in turn, will tell already to the friends and colleagues of the already experience of charity. “Sarafan“ radio will work, the people creating a good cause will become more.
10. To give same “fifty-kopeck piece“ to the beggar in the subway, at automobile intersections.
If you give free “fifty-kopeck piece“ to the beggar to the subway, then difficult this act to call a good cause. The recipient will sincerely not ask humbly before you for these fifty rubles. Or perhaps on the contrary, still quietly to hiss: “At, the jerk! Only “fifty-kopeck piece“, but gave not “sotochka“! Thrust to yourself “fifty-kopeck piece“ you know where?! Give “hundred part“!“ .
Street beggars are well organized that all know. At them, as well as in any human community, the hierarchy of the power and system of distribution of the income is built. So the most part of your “fifty-kopeck piece“, perhaps, will leave upward the subway, to the certain “king of beggars“ who lives so that other working person will envy.
The sums specified in article are approximate. Perhaps, not all ways of participation of the simple inhabitant (and rich men) in a good cause managed to be consecrated in this small research.
In conclusion there is a wish to urge readers to create a good cause in process of forces. Action, psychological support, participation in destiny of strangers and, of course, money. Let it sound and is banal, but money even in charity solves practically everything.