Rus Articles Journal

What bad is in money and as with it to be? Modern life of society it is difficult to present

without existence of money. With their help the order of redistribution of goods and services is established, but existence of monetary system imposes essential overhead costs which do not give in to optimization.

Convenience, simplicity and accuracy of monetary operations allowed money to take the important place in the human relations. Money can become a stimulator and the limiter, the judge and in the executioner, the performer and the commander. By means of money many are made, sometimes grandiose actions in economy and policy. But, giving the chance, the monetary system demands for it the corresponding payment. And, the speech here not that carrying out operations of mutual settlements imposes additional expenses introduction of electronic payment service providers brought these expenses almost to naught, the speech here that the monetary system forces to simplify a look regarding trade.

If the subject cannot be reduced to simple cost, then this subject remains beyond the scope of system of trade relations. But even if in terms of money to give an assessment not really difficult, then at this assessment many features are obviously washed away, and not always washing out does well. For example, by means of money it is not possible to adjust the correct exchange of goods that forces to make social protection. Any emergence of crises from the increasing destructive forces again and again to correct parameters creditno - the monetary relations.

The main that deprives of money of sense, so is that at very large number money ceases to play a role of the regulating mechanism. Really, what difference, how many at the person of money if he is not able to eat them neither for one ten thousand years nor for two? The superrich person is able to afford everything, but he is not able to afford to spend all the accumulation. And if allows, then it can not only bring down a modern financial system, but also saved up is sharp depreciate. Besides, the rich person is forced to devote considerable part of the life to maintaining the account, and the more is saved up, the more time for it should be spent. Not only that direct need for money disappears, so also the financial routine threatens the rich person to fill up with itself.

Therefore it is obvious that sooner or later there will be a need to solve all accruing economic problems and to solve a problem of existence of money. And it is possible to make it only in one way - abolition creditno - the monetary relations. Perhaps, it will be difficult for modern person to present how life in which there is no need for money can be organized. Really, how it can be what the person works for just like that and sells fruits of the work for a song? And why it will work if it is not obligatory to work at such system? Actually, behind the same why it works already now: for finding of some extent of influence on the processes happening in the world, only methods of influence will be slightly others.

If to look at the modern Western countries, then their population has no need to look for work. Search of a daily bread for them is not requirement any more, in the Western countries social security allows to meet the minimum needs of citizens. But, if the person has ambitions, wishes to prove or find some extent of influence, then he is forced to look for application.

Of course, process of refusal of monetary circulation can not always be simple. Not really many are capable to pass quickly from the monetary relations to impecunious. Not everyone in general is ready to refuse use creditno - monetary system. That will be more the reasons to carry out necessary transformations.

With high probability it is possible to tell that these transformations will not significantly change a deal of forces which settled in the world. Leaders modern financially - economic system usually become those not incidentally, leaders they become possessing some qualities which show the advantage on financial field of activity. As the financial system is the mechanism of the solution of many tasks, refusal of money will not cancel these tasks, but will force to adjust new, more effective ways of business management.

In conditions when force of money disappears, to the forefront there is power of trust. If the person gives fruits of the work, then he has to be sure that it is correct and that it does it not for nothing. Also, if it uses others fruits, then he has to be sure that it will not do to it harm. Those forces which in the modern world are engaged in regulation of financial and legal systems will have to undertake this role of guarantors of honesty. And this role will be played by them not only by right, but also will bring them big benefit, than they receive now.

To adjust modern system creditno - the monetary relations in which only the word of honor acts as pledge actually was not so simply as can seem at first sight. Such work demanded to put a lot of effort, such work demanded to carry out laborious work. Everyone mercenary or even just wrong action threatens to bring down many undertakings in which was enclosed by a time too much. It forced to appreciate the acquired trust, and this saved-up trust will not be unclaimed. Also as there will be unclaimed no ability to improve the relations in society as with its help essentially new public institutes and systems will be created. The trust will become that capital which will be earned and which can fully be used for a fulfillment of more significant affairs, even more significant, than are possible at the mode of money. The trust which was saved up by modern regulators will become their starting capital which they will be able to use for providing the firm situation in new conditions.

Current players financially - legal system have to realize the benefit from the new economic relations and voluntarily reconstruct themselves in a new way. Otherwise they will fall into obviously disadvantage and will not be able to resist. How it is possible to exert monetary policy impact on those who do not participate in the monetary relations? And, how it is possible to justify the fight against disinterestedness? But, the activity offering free goods and services has competitive advantage, and wins round army of the interested users.

In conclusion it is necessary to tell that there are operating examples of how monetary operations pass into the background and absolutely disappear. Impecunious form of relationship already exists on the Internet, free services in a network became very much that the considerable part of network activity will not demand any financial expenses from users. And, in these conditions there is important not so much an ability to make goods or service how many ability it is simple to interest potential users in the free goods or service that sharply increases the level of competitive fight and level of opportunities to struggle with competitors.